Nikon 14-24mm vs. Nikon 10-24mm

The 200- 400 I found I never used the 200mm end, instead I got a used 400VR f2.8 and a 1.7x and 2.0x converters.
I get 400mm2.8 – 650mmf4.5 – 800mm f5.6 with full auto focus.
Im thinking of getting a DX D300 that will give me 600mm 1020mm 1200mm awesome !
I do miss some shots if I need to change converters but Im developing a skill of quick changes and putting the correct one on for the situation .
I also get some shots with this set up that I missed with the zoom, no need to zoom.

An camera body with an FX sensor the same as 35mm or “full frame”, so if your lens is a 100mm you will get 100mm .
A Nikon DX sensor is smaller 1.5x so your 100mm lens will give you 150mm.
Canon is 1.6x so you would get 160mm with their DX sensor.
For wildlife or sport etc the DX is good, where it might not be so good is if you use a wide angle lens for landscapes your wide lens will not be as wide with DX.
The Nikon14-24 lens in this video ends up a 21-36

a dx camera has a sensor that is 1.5x smaller than an FX sensor. An FX sensor is equivalent to a 35mm slide of film in size.

whats the difference between DX and FX?

Whhhyy are the lenses soo expensive.. There’s so many lenses I would like! But darn, their like $1000 – $3000

Thanks man! I went ahead with the 14-24 mm f/2.8 and LOVE it. Bad to the bone and vivid…. I’m still with trusted D90 for real estate videos. This fisheye is exactly what I’ve been ready to buy next so heading to Amazon now!
looking at the new 70-300 II which must rock but at a price tag of $2,400, I’ll wait.

For birds and wildlife you need a tele.
The 200-400mm is a popular choice, but it’s f/4. The enxt step up for birds would be a 300mm f/2.8 and teleconverter, followed by the more expensive 400mm f/2.8, 500mm f/4 and 600mm f/4. The latter three requiring a tripod for best results.

For a less expensive consumer-grade lens, the 70-300mm is popular. the 80-400mm needs to be improved, but works.

If you don’t need filters, there no comparison. The 14-24mm is better than most primes in the same range. There is no equal, and this is not an exaggeration.

If you can swing it, get it. It’s an outstanding lens.

i’m going to get it too but it’s really expensive though

@lorikzzz
That’s not what I was asking. I bought the 14-24mm and use it on my D90. It BLOWS the 12-24mm DX lens away. No comparison.

it’s 21-31 on a DX

Which camera will you be using to shoot real estate… $ does not matter, get 14-24 mm and get the 10.5mm or 14mm fisheye, depending on whether you use DX or FX
I would get the D700 or D700x when it comes out.

I shoot luxury real estate (typically well lit) here in Miami and looking at the 14-24mm 2.8 OR the 10-24mm and can’t decide… I want vivacious (sharp) pro shots and price isn’t an issue… Any final suggestions? Currently using the 12-24mm and love it!

How does the 14-24 look on your DX?

This is very helpfull! thanks! now i know what my next buy is :]
Also do you have any recommendations on any good Macro lenses?

The nikon 70-300mm VR lens is good.

i want to get a great lens for a nikon for taking pics of birds and wildlife. wat do u think i should get no price range except for the ones that cost like 22,000 lol

FX users can use the 10-24mm. they just wont get the full frame advantage. it would be dumb, but you can use it.